We have not attempted to describe every detail of each protocol, rather to give a concise overview in all cases, with enough specifics to allow a reader to grasp the essential details and operation of protocols related to multicast IP.Every effort has been made to ensure the accurate representation of any cited works, especially any works-in-progress.TABLE OF CONTENTS Section There are three fundamental types of IPv4 addresses: unicast, broadcast, and multicast.
We expect that many of the internet-drafts which we have cited will eventually become RFCs.
See the IETF's internet-drafts shadow directories for the status of any of these drafts, their follow- on drafts, or possibly the resulting RFCs.
KMPs have been standardized for Internet Protocol Security (IPsec), and these KMPs have been formally validated for their security properties.
In the Internet, routing protocols have different requirements on their KMPs, which are not met by the existing IPsec KMPs, such as IKE, IKEv2, and GDOI.
Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months.
Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time.It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a "working draft" or "work in progress." To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the "1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the internet-drafts Shadow Directories on: (Africa) nic.(Europe) ds.(US East Coast) edu (US West Coast) au (Pacific Rim) ABSTRACT The first part of this paper describes the benefits of multicasting, the MBone, Class D addressing, and the operation of the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP).The second section explores a number of different techniques that may potentially be employed by multicast routing protocols: o Flooding o Spanning Trees o Reverse Path Broadcasting (RPB) o Truncated Reverse Path Broadcasting (TRPB) o Reverse Path Multicasting (RPM) o ''Shared-Tree'' Techniques The third part contains the main body of the paper.In this thesis, we have summarized the necessary conditions for security of routing protocols.We have analyzed the security aspects of RKMP, MRKM, and Ma RK, by formally validating those protocols using the AVISPA modeling tool.For the complete details, we refer you to the relevant specification(s).If internet-drafts were cited in this document, it is only because they were the only sources of certain technical information at the time of this writing.Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups.Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts.By clicking ' OK' you are leaving the web sites of the Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg and will be redirected to Twitter.This paper explores the spectral assignment problem and proof of value of partial destination resolution (PDR) in multicast elastic optical networks using a supplied tree approach.